By TERRI VERMEULEN KEITH
Rebecca Grossman — who was convicted in February of second-degree murder for the deaths of two young boys — told a judge in Van Nuys Friday that she wants to stick with her new attorney, despite prosecutors’ concerns about a potential conflict of interest over the lawyer’s representation of one of their former supervisors, who is awaiting arraignment on criminal charges.
Grossman, 60, told Superior Court Judge Joseph Brandolino that she understood the courtroom discussion about a potential conflict of interest, but she wanted to continue being represented by James Spertus. Spertus replaced Grossman’s team of trial attorneys following her conviction Feb. 23 on second-degree murder and other counts stemming from the September 2020 deaths of Mark and Jacob Iskander, aged 11 and 8, while they walked with their family in a Westlake Village crosswalk.
The judge said he didn’t believe there was an actual conflict of interest between Grossman and her new attorney, despite the prosecution’s contention in court papers that a conflict existed because Spertus is also representing Assistant District Attorney Diana Teran, who was in “the chain of command” for the unit handling Grossman’s case and was a “supervisor overseeing this case.”
Teran was charged April 24 by the California Attorney General’s Office with 11 felony counts of improperly using data from a government computer system without permission.
“The two cases clearly don’t intersect,” the judge said.
Spertus told the judge that he represents “two people in unrelated cases with zero overlap.”
Teran — who was “intimately involved” in making decisions on the Grossman case during the trial — is no longer over the chain of command in the case, according to Assistant Head Deputy Habib Balian of the District Attorney’s Major Crimes Division, who was recently added to the case and spoke on behalf of the prosecution during the hearing.
The Los Angeles Times…
Read the full article here
