The San Francisco Chronicle reported there was little scientific evidence to back up the argument that women are at a disadvantage when playing against transgender athletes in sports competitions.
The Northern California paper published at least two stories in the past week defending transgender athletes in female sports, after “widespread hate campaigns” had led two trans high school athletes to drop out of a statewide track and field competition.
“Attacks on trans athletes have little basis in science,” the Chronicle claimed in a piece published Friday in the Science section. “The science is far from clear as to whether trans athletes are actually faster or stronger than their cisgender peers, experts say. The evidence is especially murky for teen athletes, who may be going through puberty or taking drugs to suppress hormones — actions that could improve their performance or hinder it, or have very little impact at all.”
NPR REPORTS ‘LIMITED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH’ ON WHETHER BIOLOGICAL MALES HAVE ADVANTAGE OVER WOMEN IN SPORTS
The report said a lack of available research studying the differences between trans athletes and their peers made it “challenging to understand” what advantages trans athletes could have. The Chronicle cited two small studies out of the UK which suggested that transgender athletes had no “significant advantage” against other athletes. Both studies were authored in part by a transgender runner and PhD researcher.
Youth sports experts told the paper they believe the physical, mental and social health benefits of athletics for youth “outweighs any potential issues of unfairness.” Athletes who believe transgender competitors will deter women from competing in sports were not included in the article.
The Chronicle again downplayed the biological differences between men and women in a separate sports piece on Sunday.
“Trans women and girls have come under harsher attack than trans men and boys, due to a perceived but scientifically…
Read the full article here
